WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

The FBI is not a law enforcement agency, it's an anti-White ADL enforcement agency.

[–] 4 pts

Its has been that since it was founded by that cock sucking, cross dressing weirdo Gay Edgar Hoover. Going after a few famous bank robbers and low level (((communists))) were just PR stunts and cover for the FBI's real role as the anti-White secret political police of the (((Deep State))).

[–] 9 pts

They're not terrorist groups. Trump told us he'd register Antifa as one and his retarded supporters ate it up but he never actually did it

Yeah he said a lot of things. Did next to none of them. What a piece of shit.

[+] [deleted] 2 pts
[–] [deleted] 6 pts

FBI staffed with nothing but fat lesbos and jews.

[–] 3 pts

It isn’t a “terrorist” group because “terrorist” would imply they weren’t part of the ruling class.

[–] 1 pt

Everyone in that picture is a traitor. If President George Washington were alive, he'd order them to hang.

[–] 1 pt

2000% faggot alphabet agencies

[–] 1 pt

It's almost all women

[–] 1 pt

That fat bitch gonna need help getting up.

That sucks, but at least this info is out in the open now.

[–] 1 pt

Both law-enforcement and the military are being taken over and purged by the Democrats. They will be used similar to the SS by Hitler. Basically it’s a private Army

[–] 0 pt

I don't agree with the framing of the responses in this thread so far.

The problem with the frame of "terrorist group" is that it doesn't take into account the range of possible ways of understanding why they are doing what they are doing, which means you lock your self into a single world view and 1 or 2 ways that you can act to try to solve the problem.

If you reframe it like this: The FBI and all police forces are AN EXTENSION OF THE POLITICIANS IN POWER ...

... then you get a much broader understanding of what is going on. It allows for the terrorist categorization when appropriate but it also allows for other interpretations including which is this:

  • Police officers are not high iq independent thinkers. You don't want high iq independent thinkers as cops. You want single minded rabid hound dogs on a fox hunt chasing down their target until they get them.

  • Once you know police officers are just the hard line extension of politicians, you know that you are wasting your time focusing on the cops because the cops are not deciding who to hunt. It's the politicians.

Obviously, I am not saying there aren't things that can be done to shake the box and address the bad cop problem. BLM has managed to get police defunding to happening in a ton of place.

And obviously it isn't to say that elections and politicians are the only way to solve the problem (although it really is).

But, it is true that the more useful way to think about is that we must seize power away from those that control the cops and use them for our (and frankly the benefit of our enemies as well) benefit. And that is because human prosperity only operates on order and predictability + tiny bit of chaos, never the other way around. By seizing control over the correct points of power, we help our selves and we help everyone live better lives.

The post is fine, it's emotional and visual. But focusing only a tiny part of the picture is a waste of resources.

In that same logical regression, you could also say that the politicians are an extension of the corporate boardroom greed. And those corporate boardroom members would justify their greed as human nature. So where does the buck stop? Who takes the responsibility? Where can there be accountability?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I had to re-write my answer a few times. This is going to sound rude, but, do you even know anything about how organizations work?

I can't even begin to imagine how you can write that.

The amount of ways it's wrong could fill books.

EDIT: I keep on trying to write down all the ways why your assesment is wrong, but it's all just too long. You are right about personal responsibility - yes if we all at once stopped and made a change we could shut the country down and make an immediate change, we have the power.

But, you know the world doesn't work that way. You want to talk to all the cops and ask them to take responsibility? Go ahead, se how long that takes. You want cops in your city to stop killing white people (which they are), become their boss and change the policies + training + etc.

The second way is how the world works. The first way, I dream of it too, can happen but it is far less likely.

Let me try to rephrase all of that.

1) If we are just thinking about and drawing a through line, your statement is correct, and personal responsibility is part of the solution.

2) What might be a better way to try to visualize the problem is to start visualizing the structures as physical shapes connected to each other. There are juncture points where one or more shapes connect and and each shape has it's own set of properties: short, long, fat, skinny, rigid, flexible etc.

The juncture points are where the control is, the shapes all do the jobs they are designed for.

So, jewish survival strategy is to focus on the bureaucratic layer of societies they infect, so they almost exclusively focus on the juncture points. There are no jewish janitors for a reason. White people can do all of it, but we cannot get our people to organize because we love to atomize.

Anyway, my posts on here are not to argue. Like you, I'm trying to figure out how to understand the theatre of war that we are in and the tools the enemy is using against us so we can actually start to organize in a rational and strategic way. When I think about police officers, I think of a structure that is incredibly inflexible, low iq, low inquisitiveness, high conscientiousness, pack of predators hunting prey. If you watch the videos, do all the police officers have their own opinions? They do, but only the green officers body language betrays their true inner individuality. All police officer structures are EXTREMELY rigid and you can get police officers TO DO ANYTHING to their own people. In the US they kill more whites than blacks and they think that is normal. In France they were shooting peoples eyeballs out with plastic bullets (there are videos of this). In Britain police read your tweets, visit your home if you hurt someones feelings, talk pride parade nonsense and twerk with niggers.

Police officers are a RIGID, UNTHINKING, UNCOMPROMISING structure.

So, if we are going to visualize the problem, then we can start visualizing the solutions. We can imagine a whole range of stratgies that can start to chip away at the different juncture points as well as the shapes that connect to them. Maybe we can even come up with strategies that push the shape of the whole network of shapes + junctures into a different direction.

I think I'm just a little frustrated sometimes by observations that personal responsibility is the answer. It is, I agree. We could shut down the whole country if we could get all white people to just stop working. I even think it might be possible to do that because you don't even need all white people just a very very very large number of them.

But the shape of the problem is kind of specific and I just cannot visualize personal responsibility being an effective strategy when thinking about police officers. They are hierarchical, they follow orders, their bosses follow orders from the politicians. If the jews can insert their people into the junctures so can we. Why can't we get our people in there and changing how cops work?

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

The higher up you go, the filtration system works hard. Whoever had the most control of the financial system with bad intention already infected the economies dependent on that financial system all the way down. And if covid taught me anything, it's that personal responsibility is only a part of the puzzle to solve the problem. It won't solve anything just expecting personal responsibility from everyone.

The only thing that's a surefire solution is to change myself first, and I'm making sure I'm not becoming a part of the problem. I believe in leading by example, and I've worked hard to become reliant on less and less institutions that cater to greed over personal well being. So far that's my contribution to the society. I can only hope that the systematic change could come from those involved in those systems.

You're right, it comes off rude.

[–] 0 pt

Well thought out and formated reply. I disagree with you on just a certain level. Those kneeling are doing it on their own volition. I can say so based on how few of them there are. The bad thing is that as agents of the state, they could not do that stunt with out acceptance from their supervisors. Either their supervisors ok'ed that political message, or will not reprimand them.

[–] 1 pt

That is actually good point. I agree they are doing it of their own free will there, that is truly infuriating.