![Guilty or else [718x441 - 183KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/5lJLEr.png){kind=link}
In Ireland we have to have non-jury trials for particularly vicious scumbags due to jury intimidation. Not sure if you could apply this to everybody who commits a perceived slight against a negro in the US, but food for thought perhaps.
So a panel of judges?
I mean sure, I can't even think of the last time a panel of judges completely fucked over their citizenry.
...I know, I'm making light of a gross miscarriage, but I don't have any other solution that wouldn't be considered 'extrajudicial' or 'extremely prejudiced'.
That hasn't happened since way back in Jan of 21 when a panel decided neither states or citizens have no standing against blatant voter fraud.
Ancient history.
I'm not suggesting that. I'm asking how they do it in Ireland, in clarification of the post I responded to.
Yeah three high court judges sit. It’s called the special criminal court - we started it as a way to deal with IRA volunteers but kept it to deal with gangsters. The UN criticises it a lot but it is effective. Had a guy from IRA country up on charges of cop killing recently and they put him in front of a jury - there was rampant witness and jury intimidation by his mates throughout the trial.
(post is archived)