Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

440

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Maybe in 90's America. This is not how courts under a Bolshevik Revolution works. Get ready for more because the Communists have taken over America. We are now South Africa 2.0. Get ready to see more threats to whites and whites losing every last bit of livelihood in the legal system. The justice pillar has completely fallen.

[–] • 1 pt

Was. But isn’t.

[–] • 1 pt

HONK HONK

[–] • 0 pt

It's Nigger Justice, which is to say it's not justice at all. Justice implies the rule of law. Niggers just want what they want when they want it and if they don't get it that is "injustice". Niggers are not capable of living in a civilized society.

They have never created an advanced civilization and there is no compelling reason to believe they ever will. However, they do destroy them, which is evidenced by every example of where blacks live/rule in large numbers. There are no exceptions.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Wheres the fuck it bring it motherfucker generation?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Might makes right.

Innocence until proven guilty was, to my knowledge, first introduced by the romans.

Who were very nationalistic and expansionist.

The presumption of innocence caught on because it was forced. Because reasonable people forced their way upon the unreasonable. Because civilized people were willing to fight savages.

Today, how many people who praise the presumption of innocence are pacifists? You will not convince the savages with a good argument.

[–] • 1 pt

In Ireland we have to have non-jury trials for particularly vicious scumbags due to jury intimidation. Not sure if you could apply this to everybody who commits a perceived slight against a negro in the US, but food for thought perhaps.

[–] • 0 pt

So a panel of judges?

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah three high court judges sit. It’s called the special criminal court - we started it as a way to deal with IRA volunteers but kept it to deal with gangsters. The UN criticises it a lot but it is effective. Had a guy from IRA country up on charges of cop killing recently and they put him in front of a jury - there was rampant witness and jury intimidation by his mates throughout the trial.

[–] • 0 pt

I mean sure, I can't even think of the last time a panel of judges completely fucked over their citizenry.

...I know, I'm making light of a gross miscarriage, but I don't have any other solution that wouldn't be considered 'extrajudicial' or 'extremely prejudiced'.

[–] • 1 pt

That hasn't happened since way back in Jan of 21 when a panel decided neither states or citizens have no standing against blatant voter fraud.

Ancient history.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not suggesting that. I'm asking how they do it in Ireland, in clarification of the post I responded to.