With Ninth Circuit Declaring No Right To Carry, Will SCOTUS Respond? | Poal: Say what you want.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

589

•

With Ninth Circuit Declaring No Right To Carry, Will SCOTUS Respond? (bearingarms.com)

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

You see, the right to bear arms doesn't mean you can actually bear arms.

link

[–] • 1 pt

I wonder if we will still be able to keep them.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah the right to "keep" and bear arms doesn't mean that you can just "keep" them anywhere. For instance the gob'ment can totally just tell you that you can "keep" your arms in a gob'ment storage locker that's inaccessible to you. See! We're following the constitution!

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

They'll keep them safe for us. How many gun owners do you know that have lost their guns in boating accidents?

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 0 pt

Technically SCOTUS has already spoken when they confirmed the right to carry is an individual right and not just a militia right.

Saying you can't carry directly conflicts with both the US Constitution and previous SCOTUS precidents.

link

[–] • 1 pt

Correct, which is why the 9th should have passed on the case instead of ruling.

parent
link

created ago

This is the sub for political news related to the United States.

Please don't submit screenshots, images of text, cartoons, and memes.

Posts without clear, accessible sources may be moved or deleted.

For political images, memes, and cartoons please use:

/s/PoliticalMemes
/s/PoliticalHumor
/s/PoliticalCartoons

For political videos, please use:

/s/PoliticalVideos

For original opinion and / or commentary, please use:

/s/PoliticalCommentary

For political satire:

/s/satire

Other politics-related sites you might enjoy:

/s/Politics
/s/WorldPolitics
/s/geopolitics

For Q stuff please use the Q-focused subs, such as:

/s/QStorm
/s/QPatriots
/s/QRP
/s/QMania
/s/Qtards

For Election-related stuff:

/s/ElectoralFraud
/s/Elections