WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

622

(post is archived)

[–] 14 pts (edited )

Try it pigs. It's that or nothing. It will not end until one side is put down, and my side seems indifferent except for a few. I refuse to live in the world you want, you will not compromise to live in mine.

I won't get you all and I will fall in the end; but the first through the door is coming with me, I promise.

I'll be waiting, you commie faggots.

[–] 7 pts

Cohen Act

[–] 3 pts

Yep, passing a Cohen act guarantees civil war.

[–] 2 pts

*kike hand rubbing intensifies...

[–] 2 pts

and all the Cohen's sitting in israel, or the Cohen's sitting safely in capitol buildings surrounded by razor wire and protected by goyim troops, won't be in the line of fire as we shoot each other down fighting over our freedoms.

[–] 6 pts

So rescind the 4th amendment?

[–] 3 pts

While rescinding the 2nd...

[–] 3 pts

I mean Katrina happened already.

But next time they'll deputize ms13 to do it for them. The Turner Diaries

[–] 1 pt

But next time they'll deputize ms13 to do it for them.

Have you seen public sector workers? It's wokefest 9000 out there.

[–] 3 pts

Good luck.

[–] 2 pts

There is only one reason the government would want to disarm its population, it is about to do something that would get it shot.

[–] 2 pts

If you don't already live in a county where your sheriff has EXPRESSLY STATED that he and his deputies will have NO part in gun confiscation, you need to move.

[–] 4 pts

Until the get voted out by the Dominion machines. My guess is those are the next targets.

[–] 2 pts
[–] 0 pt

That's what they've always wanted to do. Idk if Joe Biden is the right neoliberal to do it under but it's coming closer with every democrat administration.

Implying they haven't started doing it already

If you wanted to disarm some segment of the population to prevent them from staging an armed rebellion, what you would do is send teams to their houses to collect the weapons, arrest them if they don't hand them over (if they refuse, or if they say they don't have them, but haven't got proof that they did so in such a way that the law requires of them, which would allow you to track down where the weapon went and what had happened to it)

What you would not do is tell anyone you were doing any of this, and you would shut down anyone who would spread the word, because you need to prevent the targets from finding out, since that might lead to them getting together and doing the whole "armed revolt" thing (though you know they won't, as nothing would make them do such a thing, and they are more likely to just try to run away, but it's better to be on the safe side and get as much guns as you can while still keeping everyone who you have yet to disarm from finding out).

Load more (4 replies)