![What a *cohencidence? [955x1280 - 636KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/O6fiJ9.png){kind=link}
Stop using "Fascist" like you're a retarded Boomer. Fascism does not mean "big mean government."
We are living under Communsism and the only time Fascism arises is to combat Communsism.
Fascism is good.
Fascism is the merging of corporations and government. We have a mix of Fascism and Communism with a nice sprinkling of Technocracy. Just because they were opposite foes during WW2 doesn't mean they are such a black & white dichotomy today in America.
The main problem is the CENTRALIZATION of power which exists in both models, AKA Despotism. The Constitution de-centralized power, but slowly it has become more Federated and Centralized, and now all levels of government have become corrupt from the States to DC. In addition to that, government isn't even the only power because there are more unelected groups and powers calling the shots than elected officials.
You're retarded. I don't know where the meme that Fascism is corporations and the government colluding came from, but that's absolutely not what it is.
Communsists won WWII and taught you that Fascism is bad and, like a stupid Boomer, you believe them.
Please provide your definition of Fascism then. You can say what it's not, so why don't you define it?
Fascism is the merging of corporations and government.
According to our pal Razorfist, the world's greatest devotee of Il Duce, that quote of his about fascism being the merging of corporations and government is apocryphal at best.
I suspect that Il Duce did indeed not say the quote because the merging of corporations and government is the form of "capitalism" that (((Marx))) described, and what we have been living under since at least 1913 in the USA.
Do you have a more accurate definition of it than the merging of corporations & government?
The Constitution de-centralized power
I'm not so sure that it did, because the anti-federalists were trying to tone it down and break it up from Day One of the Republic.
Compared to what we have today, sure, it is less centralized, but even George Washington was using the troops to beat up on Deplorables.
Stop lying, cuck. Fascism and communism are both products of the Hegelian dialectic. They're both big government statism. They're both authoritarianism. They're both Anti-Liberty.
You want Authority, not Liberty you fucking idiot. That's literally what Civilization is built on.
Yes, I need the State to tell me how to run my business. (files.catbox.moe)
I'm convinced lolberts can't be saved.
If you don't at least cede that Hamiltonian Fascism is/was fucking based, you are a fucking shabbos goy.
hurr durr (files.catbox.moe)
Hamiltonian Fascism
Which Hamilton would that be named for?
Stop using "Fascist" like you're a retarded Boomer. Fascism does not mean "big mean government."
Whine some more over irrelevant details that will fall on deaf ears because you think your philosophy is more important than a message the public will comprehend.
What you should be doing is advocating nationalism. Thats a label people can understand, and has a whole lot less baggage.
What you should be doing is advocating nationalism.
Nationalism has a big problem though, as it carries the baggage of civic nationalism. Civic Nationalism is what the Jews used for 50+ years to degrade us to this point of being a minority in our own country.
Civic Nationalism is the faggotry that leads to White men electing women and brown people to rule over them. It is a philosophy so insidious that it gets the demographic that claims to be Christian to jubilantly punish itself with the same curses that the Bible states God will inflict upon those who go against him.
as it carries the baggage of civic nationalism.
Maybe. But I don't think the average american is that sophisticated.
Equate it with "useless left wing libertarianism" and that pretty much diffuses the issue of nationalism vs civic nationalism.
You put nationalism opposite of libertarianism. Adopt the economic values of it, while keeping the social policies of nationalism.
Marxist racial rhetoric and communism fails in a right-wing economy and the moderately 'leftwing' talking points of egalitarianism on the social front act essentially as rhetorical ablative shielding.
This isn't an original idea of course. "Western chauvinism" comes to mind. They had the publicity angle correct, a little shock and awe, someone their opponents could wildly exaggerate, and unwittingly promote in the process, they just lacked mass appeal. And because we live in the age of mass politics, the more general the better. You want to approach empty signifier levels of generality with the label you choose.
It means your opponents get "literal nazis!" as the free spot on their bingo cards, but that cards already been played out anyway, and all they do is call further attention to how absurd it is. While you get to talk civic nationalism while being anything but.
The problem with accusing others of dogwhistling long enough is eventually it comes true, but by the time it does everyone has stopped listening.
When the real "white supremacists" arrive in front of the american public, we will arrive as mere nationalists (as it were), moderates, and saviors from bolshevik insanity. All 'moderate' simply by the relative example that the bolsheviks themselves set in extremis.
As the blacks like to say, they played themselves.
Show me an instance where Fascism and nationalism weren't synonymous.
Fascism and nationalism weren't synonymous.
America before communism.
...and may God have mercy on your soul. (youtu.be)
(post is archived)