WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

Especially true with the anti-White filtering of entry level jobs. The reject replies usually start with "unfortunately, you don't fit the profile"....

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, all the "good guy" older people trying to give us younger white guys advice about getting a job without understanding what you just said don't seem to understand that we know what we need to do, and want to do it, but can't.

They seem to think that, because all the things we're dealing with now, were being talked about when they were our age, that they were able to "overcome" it, so why can't we. Well...because unlike 20-30 years ago...the people talking about "whiteness" aren't just talking about it...they're implementing it, resulting in what you just said.

I'm sorry, but the 40-50 year olds who complain about Boomers just not getting it are acting pretty Boomer-ish themselves.

[–] 0 pt

Not in trade skills. They want white people because white people work and are smart enough to do a job well and do it quickly. Nobody wants anything other than a white male on a trade skill position.

Plumbers make 6 figures. Electricians make 6 figures. You don't need college. You don't need debt. You get paid to learn on the job. These jobs can't be replaced by automation.

Learn a trade.

Faggot.

[–] 6 pts

This is by design, the goal is to bankrupt and destitute white people, to have them pay for their own demise, see them on the streets dying. Outside this site, and some fringes, people dont seem to understand the viceral hatred jews have for white people, and christians.

[–] 1 pt

Correct. Its not incompetence, or misguided ambitions.

Its pure, purposeful, unbridled hatred.

[–] 2 pts

I really enjoy this guy's point of view. He walks a thin line between idiots and patriots. He does it masterfully.

[–] 2 pts

He addressed congress on the "war on work" like 10 years ago.

[–] 2 pts

Mike Rowe for President.

[–] 0 pt

Lindell/Rowe 2024.

...too bad elections are a joke.

[–] 0 pt

I could see a cross party populist movement with that to be honest.

[–] 0 pt

So this begs the question: how does one go about solving this problem?

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Let student loans be dischargeable in bankruptcy again. When there is risk, banks will take an interest in only loaning money to students and fields of study that are likely to be able to repay. The whole aim of making student loans 100% risk-free for the banks was to take market forces out of education so they could supplant those forces with their social agenda. When the banks take on the risk of financing a gender studies degree, they are suddenly less willing. Go figure.

[–] 0 pt

Banks are almost entirely factored out of the student loan equation though, as 0bama established what is effectively a federal monopoly on student lending.

The only quibble is that the feds will be all "Oh, SallieMae is private", which is a distinction without a difference in this case.

[–] 0 pt

Banks own majority stakes Sallie Mae.