Yes and no. Devil in the details. RNA signals to DNA to assist with specific tasks or functions in the body, up to and including replication. In some cases RNA binds to DNA during replication. RNA strands can in fact modify DNA by communicating with DNA during replication. Should RNA bind to DNA strand during replication, especially if it prevents proper/complete RNA strand binding, the DNA itself can be modified, corrupted, or even become unstable. Should it become corrupted or unstable, there is a host possible outcomes ranging from organ failure to death to inheritable genetic disease.
Why do you think most test animals died from organ failure?
Viruses can do this. They carry RNA or DNA that is used as blueprints for proteins that enter the nucleus. Some viruses do it just to influence gene expression, for example, SARS-CoV-2 inhibits the gene expression needed to create stuff that alerts the cells around. Others produce proteins that manipulate the DNA: Modified adenoviruses are used to cure hereditary diseases in children because they can exchange parts of the DNA, and they can do it in all cells at once. But the mRNA vaccines contain only a very short RNA sequence, just enough to create the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.
Animals die from a vaccine overdose: After the cell has created the spike protein, it detects alien stuff and presents it on its surface, so the immune system can detect and learn to fight against it. Viruses can create other proteins that can prevent the cell from doing that (so they have more time to multiply), but vaccines don't contain the blueprints for that. Once presented on the surface, the alien stuff gets detected by immune cells that destroy the cell (before more alien stuff or viruses are created). Too much vaccine leads to too many destroyed cells, and to an overreaction of the immune system (cytokine storm). In animal tests, they try to find the maximal dose, so animals die.
Fact is RNA's role in ther body is exceptionally poorly understood. Only two decades ago it was largely considered junk. Accordingly its important to not trivialize what's going on here or it's implications. There is an abundance of empirical evidence of dangers and almost none of its efficacy or safety. Up until very recent, they had a 100% fatality rate in test animals; including euthanasia. So trivialization of the dangers is a serious red flag.
You also seem to not know that contamination is common, as are malformed mrna strands. You also completely ignored the binding issue and completely ignore that the bulk of test animal deaths were not from "overdoses" of any sort.
The fact all fact checkers seem to agree with you while they use identical verbiage among themselves is another red flag.
It's great you're researching. Please continue to do so.
(post is archived)