Here's why this post is naive bullshit.
1) The people who make the laws, enforce the laws, and prosecute based on the laws do not care about us. They don't respect you, they don't identify with you, and they're not interested in justice for you. The fact that their foot soldiers are constantly breaking the law, therefore, will obviously have no consequences under normal circumstances.
2) A rational people who are mentally and morally capable of protecting and preserving themselves - such a people would realize, if the law is formulated to destroy them, it might be time to start thinking about how to act outside of the law. But if you even suggest that we start contemplating this, everyone starts yelling "Shill! There's an FBI agent! Everyone get back in line and follow the behavior allowed by the lawmakers who are destroying us! We love the Founding Fathers, but would never take their example."
3) People like OP never seem to realize that it doesn't matter if the Feds and the ADL-types want you to commit crimes so that they can take away your freedoms. They are doing it anyway, even if you do nothing. If they want an enemy to justify suppressing you faster, and you do nothing, they simply hoax and false flag. There is no honest investigative media to expose them. Anyone who questions too publicly gets censored. Your compliance doesn't do anything, but show your enemies that there are no consequences for their current level of tyranny.
4) Sure, you can find examples of yesmen and low-level enforcers taking the brunt of the punishment when a society falls. But this is almost never organic. This happens when the new power that fills the vacuum wants to destroy any remnant of the previous power that represents a competing identity or ideology. If the federal government collapses, who would step into that power vacuum? Would it be the small number of serious nationalists that don't have the resources or spine to act, even when their nation has been shutdown and their democracy has been stolen? Or would it be the Jewish financial empire, the corporate machine, the internationalists that already stand in power behind the throne, totally unopposed? Because the latter would love to continue using these enforcers to continue to suppress you, rather than scapegoat them or allow them to be left to the wolves.
Disclaimer: let's all be good boys, and we'll save our families by keeping our head down and fantasizing about somebody saving us when things finally go too far, as though we're not already living in dystopia. I am not encouraging anyone to do anything, because then we might be in danger.
If anyone is uncomfortable with what I've said, feel free to explain how I'm obviously a Fed, or tell me about our lord and savior Q.
Would it be the small number of serious nationalists that don't have the resources or spine to act, even when their nation has been shutdown and their democracy has been stolen?
inciting violence
It was a rhetorical question, with the implied answer obviously being: no, nationalists are not going to step into the power vacuum and take over, if society collapses. So, no, it was not a call to violence. Get better reading comprehension.
Though, if society does collapse, obviously there will be a lot of violence, so I'm not sure why you're clutching your pearls about this statement, grandma.
Also, I'm glad there are people like you, who know that we must never break the rules, even if the rule makers are trying to destroy us. Really, the only way we can be safe is if we point and cry whenever anyone looks to be thinking about stepping out of line, even if that line is leading us right into brutal tyranny. You're a good boy.
(post is archived)