![I am one of you [940x545 - 61KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/hp5Ei7.jpg){kind=link}
Except that men passed the 19th ammendment. How does that work?
Jews.
So even if only white men are in power, they are still going to be outsmarted and manipulated by jews?
Isn’t that why you dont want white women voting? Because we are too susceptible to jews?
I got to say, Im not impressed with white men then.
It’s supposed to be A White Man in power. A King. Of an ethnic nation. This was the standard pattern for the longest time, and it worked pretty well - better than democracy.
In hell, there is democracy. In Heaven a kingdom. What in the hell is this voting nonsense?
Isn’t that why you dont want white women voting?
Don’t want any voting. But if the Chiefs of Clans form some goofy republic crap, we’re doomed to the standard lifecycle of civilizations. ~250 years.
But the way to get the most mileage out of it is restricted voting. Voting is always a proxy for violence, and violence is always an option. Women have no more business voting than they do fighting.
If you’re promoting some amazon culture, you’re doomed to a single generation, for obvious reasons.
Did they? State legislatures had wahmen on them decades before the 19th.
So decades before that men in Massachusetts or wherever let women vote in Massachusetts. You just kicked the can down the road a bit.
Men made the political decision to allow women, a politically fallible species according to you, to make political decisions. A rather fallible decision if your assertion is correct. Maybe they were only fallible that one time though.
Ultimately, women let women vote. This is because Jewish males are, to quote a Jewish male, female in their mindset, and because Jews called the shots. Particularly in Jew England.
All enabling of degeneracy is always a cohencidence.
(post is archived)