You can argue semantics, but it doesn't change the fact that (((they))) are playing both sides.
You can argue semantics, but it doesn't change the fact that (((they))) are playing both sides.
The Jews are certainly playing both sides. Their “conservatives” are people like Glenn beck, Shapiro, crowder, etc. But saying “left v. right is a distraction” is an inaccurate way to describe the problem.
The Jews are certainly playing both sides. Their “conservatives” are people like Glenn beck, Shapiro, crowder, etc. But saying “left v. right is a distraction” is an inaccurate way to describe the problem.
Okay, what's an accurate way to describe the problem?
Okay, what's an accurate way to describe the problem?
Just call out the kiked mainstream “conservative” narratives. My roommate listens to Glenn beck and supported Israel, so I told him about the USS Liberty and 9/11. It takes a really long time to redpill normiecons but it’s usually possible. And definitely don’t describe neocons as “right wing”
Just call out the kiked mainstream “conservative” narratives. My roommate listens to Glenn beck and supported Israel, so I told him about the USS Liberty and 9/11. It takes a really long time to redpill normiecons but it’s usually possible. And definitely don’t describe neocons as “right wing”
(post is archived)