Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

134

It's all distraction from you know (((what))).

It's all distraction from you know (((what))).

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

CHYNA

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Do you think China is owned by the jews or are fighting the jews? Same question for america.

[–] • 0 pt

If I was a fancy chinaman... and I compared the number of my people and my square mileage to "jew" or israel, I would do exactly neither for a diaspora "nation" that's 1/420 the size of my country with an even smaller ratio of people.

neither.

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

Jews = Left.

Left vs. right is not a distraction.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The mistake is seeing yourself as 'right'

Right is just what the jews get you to call yourself so you think you're opposing them. 90% of the right probably supports jews, or won't support the action to remove them. It's just like how you probably see the middle east as your enemy, a bunch of inbred cave dwellers. Meanwhile who else is fighting the jews other than them? America IS the jews. You have to leave their system and their politics. Or else you're still controlled.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I agree with almost everything you said. I don't buy into the Jewish pro-war propaganda against the middle east. I understand that America is the jews and both parties are kiked.

However, "right" and "left" are valid political descriptions. I will continue to use them.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

It just seems that both sides are using the Hegelian dialectic, pushing us further towards the end. The elections are probably all fake everywhere. Do the sides matter? Maybe... The left at least says we need to kill the rich...

I don't know man. It seems like the right are the biggest cucks too. Cucked by legality and morality.

[–] • 0 pt

Neoconservatives.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Neoconservatives ≠ Right. If you want to make a point against normiecons and neocons be more specific. Otherwise you just sound like "we need UNITY guys! Liberals aren't really our enemy!"

[–] • 0 pt

You can argue semantics, but it doesn't change the fact that (((they))) are playing both sides.