Murders, not deaths. "Deaths" assumes no fault by itself, the word "murder" on the other hand demands an actor at fault. Do not use their language.
TL;DR: Of course they will.
TL;DR: Of course they will.
Murders, not deaths. "Deaths" assumes no fault by itself, the word "murder" on the other hand demands an actor at fault. Do not use their language.
The author can't accuse him of murder, despite how satisfying it might be to write that word in the article.
The author can't accuse him of murder, despite how satisfying it might be to write that word in the article.
The author maybe, but should OP follow along with it?
The author could use rhetorical tricks to get out of a lawsuit anyways.
Did Cuuumo murder these people? News at 11!
Cuuumo's (1)murders blah blah blah
The point is WE should not be using their language. Break yourself of the habit. It only helps their side by assuming their framework.
The author maybe, but should OP follow along with it?
The author could use rhetorical tricks to get out of a lawsuit anyways.
>Did Cuuumo murder these people? News at 11!
>Cuuumo's [(1)](#spoiler)murders blah blah blah
>
>
>[(1) alleged](#spoiler)
The point is *WE* should not be using their language. Break yourself of the habit. It only helps their side by assuming their framework.
I am not going to edit the title of every single article I share. (I'm the OP.)
I am not going to worry about using "their" words, nor am I going to worry about changing the minds of others who likely won't even see this post on Poal.
I am not going to edit the title of every single article I share. (I'm the OP.)
I am not going to worry about using "their" words, nor am I going to worry about changing the minds of others who likely won't even see this post on Poal.
(post is archived)