you make good points... but what about N&S Dakota? Really asking as I only have a vague notion.
Northern midwest isn't bad since it is quite White. I am originally from the midwest (not the northern midwest like the Dakotas, etc) and I do think eventually those areas could be merged into the northwest homeland perhaps. However, I am unsure overall. Two reasons: 1. Landlocked. No access to water or the coast. 2. Not the most ideal in regard to farmland or material acquisition. We need lots of good farming land and the northwest has it. Look at the South American countries. The poorest one is Bolivia for two big reasons: 1. Landlocked, no access to the water/ocean, 2. Most people there are Indians. But look at Chile who is quite well off for two reasons: 1. Access to the water, 2. Most folks there are White or Castizo.
as I pondered this, I thought to myself.... maybe someplace where there isnt anyone there, but checks all those boxes.
I never suggest canada, because I once realized that an American moving to Canada is literally saying: "Ok, I'm fine with being subject to a monarch" and throwing freedom in the trash. Cant do it.
Then it hit me.... ALASKA
me: rolls up in camaro
indians: "aw shit, this again"
Hmmm, again it could work as an extension of the northwest homeland. I know of someone who did indeed migrate there. However, again not the most ideal choice due to us needing access to farmland, materials, etc.
(post is archived)