WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

988

In most cases, a court victory is an unlikely path to make a meaningful mark on election procedure, said Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California-Irvine. Hasen, who is an expert on election law, told the Washington Examiner that Republican-led state legislatures are more likely to have success in suppressing mail-in voting.

“I don’t think litigation generally will be the path to rolling back early and mail-in voting,” he said. “It’s much more likely to happen through legislation.”

And in the 23 states where Republicans hold legislative majorities, many representatives have already put that legislation in play. There are more than 106 GOP-sponsored bills in 28 states seeking to tighten voting laws, the liberal group Brennan Center for Justice found in a recent report. Many of the bills seek to curb the mail-ballot expansion that occurred during the pandemic, as well as to introduce voter-ID laws.

> In most cases, a court victory is an unlikely path to make a meaningful mark on election procedure, said Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California-Irvine. Hasen, who is an expert on election law, told the Washington Examiner that Republican-led state legislatures are more likely to have success in suppressing mail-in voting. > “I don’t think litigation generally will be the path to rolling back early and mail-in voting,” he said. “It’s much more likely to happen through legislation.” > And in the 23 states where Republicans hold legislative majorities, many representatives have already put that legislation in play. There are more than 106 GOP-sponsored bills in 28 states seeking to tighten voting laws, the liberal group Brennan Center for Justice found in a recent report. Many of the bills seek to curb the mail-ballot expansion that occurred during the pandemic, as well as to introduce voter-ID laws.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

So you're saying that democrats are lazy and stupid?