WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

356

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

What he’s saying it is it won’t hold up in the Supreme Court, most likely due to previous rulings. THEY KNOW THIS. They are doing the same with the mail-in voting bill, it’s unconstitutional, it won’t survive as law. They are trying to garner public support for stacking the courts by claiming they can’t do anything, rather than passing constitutional legislation to actually help Americans they are wasting legislative bandwidth in an effort to undermine the entire system.

[–] 4 pts

Is that the same (((Supreme Court))) that just chose to not hear concrete cases of blatant election fraud?

[–] 2 pts

Won't hold up in SCOTUS

Sure thing. Then what about GCA of '68 or NFA of '34?

Both extremely unconstitutional.

Or how about red flag laws?

[–] 0 pt

The federal license requirement specifically.

[–] 0 pt

LITERALLY EVERY SINGLE gun restriction is unconstitutional.

What makes you think one more step down the anti-gun rabbit hole will be ruled as such?