WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

270

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts (edited )

While your post is true. It's meaningless.

Every

Single

Gun

"law"

Is unconstitutional. Including the ones most people stupidly agree with. Such as "no guns for felons" and "no guns for misdemeanor DV convicts". The literal only restriction on guns is this;

The government can't restrict guns or any type of weapon, for any reason. Ever.

Even with a constitutional amendment. The first 10 are inalienable even by the constitutional amendment process itself.

End.

[–] 3 pts

Also including the NFA in its entirety and concealed carry permits.

[–] 2 pts

Yes the big one too.

I merely wanted to hit on the ones that people stupidly think are fine.

[–] 2 pts

My state is constitutional carry. How do they plan to change that?

[–] 1 pt

Mine as well, every state should be.

[–] 0 pt

Federal "law" has precedent over state law. The constitution is the highest law of the land though.

[–] 0 pt

What he’s saying it is it won’t hold up in the Supreme Court, most likely due to previous rulings. THEY KNOW THIS. They are doing the same with the mail-in voting bill, it’s unconstitutional, it won’t survive as law. They are trying to garner public support for stacking the courts by claiming they can’t do anything, rather than passing constitutional legislation to actually help Americans they are wasting legislative bandwidth in an effort to undermine the entire system.

[–] 4 pts

Is that the same (((Supreme Court))) that just chose to not hear concrete cases of blatant election fraud?

[–] 2 pts

Won't hold up in SCOTUS

Sure thing. Then what about GCA of '68 or NFA of '34?

Both extremely unconstitutional.

Or how about red flag laws?

[–] 0 pt

The federal license requirement specifically.