There's a bug when you create a post asking you if you want to leave when submitting it, just click leave page. Fixing it now. You won't have to do anything.

WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 13 pts 4y

Unconstitutional. Illegal laws are not laws.

[–] 10 pts 4y (edited 4y)

While your post is true. It's meaningless.

Every

Single

Gun

"law"

Is unconstitutional. Including the ones most people stupidly agree with. Such as "no guns for felons" and "no guns for misdemeanor DV convicts". The literal only restriction on guns is this;

The government can't restrict guns or any type of weapon, for any reason. Ever.

Even with a constitutional amendment. The first 10 are inalienable even by the constitutional amendment process itself.

End.

[–] 3 pts 4y

Also including the NFA in its entirety and concealed carry permits.

[–] 2 pts 4y

Yes the big one too.

I merely wanted to hit on the ones that people stupidly think are fine.

[–] 2 pts 4y

My state is constitutional carry. How do they plan to change that?

[–] 0 pt 4y

What he’s saying it is it won’t hold up in the Supreme Court, most likely due to previous rulings. THEY KNOW THIS. They are doing the same with the mail-in voting bill, it’s unconstitutional, it won’t survive as law. They are trying to garner public support for stacking the courts by claiming they can’t do anything, rather than passing constitutional legislation to actually help Americans they are wasting legislative bandwidth in an effort to undermine the entire system.

[–] 4 pts 4y

Is that the same (((Supreme Court))) that just chose to not hear concrete cases of blatant election fraud?

[–] 2 pts 4y

Won't hold up in SCOTUS

Sure thing. Then what about GCA of '68 or NFA of '34?

Both extremely unconstitutional.

Or how about red flag laws?

[–] 2 pts 4y

They'll just dismiss the challenge on technicalities

[–] [deleted] 2 pts 4y

Doesn't matter to these kikes. Go look up the retroactive Lautenberg Amednment that RETROACTIVELY took away gun rights from citizens. It's never been overturned. All laws will be unjust in a gov't filled with a foreign enemy.

[–] 0 pt 4y

Tell that to the ATF after they shoot your neighbors dog then realize they got the wrong house a d come knocking on your door.

[–] 8 pts 4y

This bill was introduced in the prior Congress and has been sitting in committee(congress.gov) since March of 2020.

[–] 2 pts 4y

I've seen a number of posts like this one that are attempting to trick people into getting upset about old news and I can't figure out what the purpose is.

[–] 3 pts 4y

Glownigger disinformation campaign.

[–] 0 pt 4y

So what's the point then? What would be the benefit?

[–] 1 pt 4y

I'm not sure the intent is to get people upset about old news. I suspect it's just a matter of confirmation bias - not digging into something because it matches what you already know.

[–] 1 pt 4y

That's likely it

[–] 1 pt 4y

I'm glad other people notice it too.

[–] 5 pts 4y

Is this one of those things they introduce every term? I think the cucks try to get through gun control every term to get brownie points with their fag supporters

[–] 2 pts 4y

It's democracy. Ignore when the people say they don't want it and keep pushing something unwanted until it passes.

[–] 4 pts 4y

I really wish everyone would take 5 seconds and do a search on the bill someone is using to get your panties in a wad. Outrage on dead bills just mean you guys look like fools. The current congress is the 117th. At least make sure the bill is for this season.

[+] [deleted] 2 pts 4y
[–] 2 pts 4y

all ready own

[–] 2 pts 4y

The bottom part of the graphic is not true. Existing guns will be exempt according to how the bill is currently worded.

[–] 2 pts 4y

Don't fight back, it's a false flag! Just keep letting them take everything away from us and trust the plan™!

[–] 0 pt 4y

This is the correct answer

[–] 2 pts 4y

Time to stock up on a... oh right, been sold out for months.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt 4y

I don't see anything about additional taxes, but there are some pretty concerning parts in it.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5717/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%225717%22%5D%7D&r=1&s=1#toc-H80B74C01E3404F4DBD03D4A21098DBD0

Establishment Of Federal Firearm Owner's License.—

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall issue a Federal firearm owner's license to any individual who is eligible under subsection (b).

“(2) ISSUANCE OF LICENSE OR NOTICE OF DENIAL.—Not later than 40 days after the date on which an individual submits an application for a Federal firearm owner's license under this section, the Attorney General shall—

“(A) determine whether the individual is eligible to possess a license under this section; and

“(B) based on the determination under subparagraph (A)—

“(3) EXPIRATION.—A Federal firearm owner's license issued under this section shall expire on the date that is 10 years after the date on which the license was issued.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt 4y

Prohibitions and unreasonable taxes are an opportunity for people with the right attitude about it.

Load more (10 replies)