Courts punting with "lack of standing", jurisdiction, etc does not disprove the copious evidence that you just glossed over.
The rest of your rant is nonsense.
Here you obviously avoid examining the evidence because it doesn't align with your political objectives. The rest of us see you moved the goal posts.
Go ahead come on out of your bunker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymb9m3GEcmA&feature=emb_logo
OK troll. But your posting of the same interview with the newbie congressman isn't persuading anyone here. I don't know him, and I certainly didn't conclude there was voter fraud because of him.
Here's a law professor discussing the problems with the 2020 election narrative, and debunking the "trump failed in court" fallacy. He's thoughtful, well-spoken, and correct. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/law-prof-election-fraud-evidence-significant-cases-dismissed-only-on-legal-process-grounds
(I hadn't seen this video until today - I didn't come to conclusions because of this professor but it's a fair summary)
You, and your "professor" are incorrect and lying to yourself to think that none of the cases thrown out were due to lack of evidence.
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
Says someone with the dumbest conspiracy theory I've read all day.
Let me get this straight...
You're asserting that it is "GOP voter suppression" for Amazon to have it's workers vote at their workplace. These warehouse workers and delivery drivers are already going to be on premises.
You can't use conspiracy theories of African American, Latino, etc neighborhoods allegedly deliberately having polls far away from walking distance. Or long lines. etc. Not this time.
You provide zero logical reasoning for why pro union workers would be suppressed disproportionately to your demonized opposition (anti union workers). You abdicated the burden of proof.
Qtards are higher functioning than you. Pull yourself together.
(post is archived)