OK troll. But your posting of the same interview with the newbie congressman isn't persuading anyone here. I don't know him, and I certainly didn't conclude there was voter fraud because of him.
Here's a law professor discussing the problems with the 2020 election narrative, and debunking the "trump failed in court" fallacy. He's thoughtful, well-spoken, and correct. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/law-prof-election-fraud-evidence-significant-cases-dismissed-only-on-legal-process-grounds
(I hadn't seen this video until today - I didn't come to conclusions because of this professor but it's a fair summary)
You, and your "professor" are incorrect and lying to yourself to think that none of the cases thrown out were due to lack of evidence.
On second thought.. fuck it. I'll provide a list, for the benefit of anyone else reading who's on the fence.
http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm
I'd provide a listing of the cases and dispositions but see no point. You'd just keep gaslighting.
(post is archived)