Fuck off. Source something.
Fuck off. Source something.
You can actually see the stuff happening around the murders, the only evidence you will be seeing of the murder occurring at all.
A purge is upon us, all the good or not-completely-terrible people in politics who aren't too famous (so their disappearance wouldn't raise suspicion) are getting got in an effort to make the American political system a domain solely for scumbags, keep an eye out.
The "game of thrones" type shit is actually real, and always has been, we were always ruled by machiavellian deadly decadent court intrigue and betrayal, it was just hidden under and illusion of law and order and peace.
Now a lot of us have woken up to the fact that it was just an illusion, we live under a bunch of conspiracies and counter-conspiracies. A lot of the "crazies" in the "fringe conspiracy subculture" were correct. Take that, Penn and Teller!
"Too many people would have to be involved, no way they could cover something like that up" - people do blow the whistle, and they get ignored, slandered, and "debunked" by useful idiots like you two garbage boomers (one of whom is a Jew and the other is a pervert who swings between "horny fat fuck" and "depressed deflated balloon", and constantly refers to the "nahtzees" as if they were the worst people on the planet, instead of the ones who took a stand against the actual worst people in the world).
If Penn or Teller ever see this, and I know they won't, I have a message for you: Look at your butt-buddy Michaels Shermer's interview with holocaust deniers, he's clearly losing the debate and having a hard time of it on that show, the holocaust deniers won strong on that programme, and he immediately betrayed everything a skeptic is supposed to be like in the effort to shut them down. I remember watching that talk show episode and coming away with it believing the opposite of what I had when I first sat down to watch it.
This was further reinforced when I saw the documentary of the Ernst Zundel case that happened in my city. I went from merely believing the holocaust might have been a lie, to knowing for a certain that it was definitely made up.
This was an airtight case that was made, with all the evidence and arguments on one side of the debate, and yet the opposite is accepted as uncontestable fact, simply because of the forces of social pressure and government power. No one wants to accept that this genocide didn't actually occur, so it becomes something that is determined to be untrue on an "A Priori" basis.
Even the court case that concluded that it didn't happen had a verdict that said it did happen, why? because even after all the evidence and arguments were examined, and the result was the exact opposite of what everyone expected, they determined that because Jews were so deeply affected by the events that didn't occur, we should conclude that they did, basically "Ruling in favor of X makes Jews upset, therefore X must be rejected".
The documentary runs itself in circles trying to make this seem like a just and fair verdict that isn't a completely fucked up act of tyranny from the bench, they did it by focusing on the sad Jews who were involved in the case, talking about how "justice was done" and "truth prevailed" and how that "nightmare was over" for them (you know, because they worked themselves up that they were so fucking terrified of the "ebul nahtzees", which was also a focus of the documentary). Then it was simply declared that any attempts at getting the case retried were to be denied automatically, and any future case where the holocaust would be called into doubt would be forbidden.
The whole case was then treated as "a bigot's attempt at the humiliation of the Jewish people, beaten by the power of the truth", like it was a victory, like the whole verdict wasn't a sham, the Judge who ruled it apparently disagreed, he dies regretting this and wishing he could have changed it.
So we walk into a courtroom, where there are severe penalties for lying or deception (including through fallacious argumentation), and all evidence and arguments are thoroughly examined and analyzed (by both sides), and every expert in the WORLD was willing to come and participate, and the conspiracy theorists tear the whole prevailing narrative to fucking shreds, they just clean house, the whole of everything back them up to such a degree that it embarrasses anyone who saw it and believed in the holocaust claims. They get a curb-stomp, one-sided trial in their favor.
...and they lose, because they hold no power, and the judge can declare whatever the fuck he wants, and everyone hated them, if anyone cared for the truth as revealed by science, they would have won, but since no one cared about the truth, and were only holding the trial because they thought their side was going to win, the "conspiracy theorists" lost, it all came down to "might makes right" and "right" includes the right to decide the truth is whatever they want it to be.
For a more modern example, look at the 2020 election fraud, the claim was determined to be untrue because the courts refused to hear it at all, smart, they may have learned from incidents like the Zundel case that when you are afraid of seeing your claims torn to shreds, you do whatever it takes to keep them from ever being officially questioned at all (on the chance that your claims are full of shit).
Tell me how that makes any sense as a means of "debunking" a claim - "I'm not listening to you, therefore everything you say is untrue" - that is the logic of kindergarteners being used here, and it is seemingly enough on it's own to "debunk" a conspiracy theory.
This is the problem that faces conspiracy theories, they may be true and able to prove themselves beyond a shadow of a doubt, but no one is willing to listen, and those who do? they will use any excuse not to pretend the theorists are wrong, even age regressing playground logic like "you make people sad" or "I've got my ears plugged up", those with the power will simply use it in whatever way they think will make it so that their beliefs are not challenged. then later they will see the damage caused by this childishness, and wish they could reverse it, but they will die without having that opportunity.
You can actually see the stuff happening around the murders, the only evidence you will be seeing of the murder occurring at all.
A purge is upon us, all the good or not-completely-terrible people in politics who aren't too famous (so their disappearance wouldn't raise suspicion) are getting got in an effort to make the American political system a domain solely for scumbags, keep an eye out.
The "game of thrones" type shit is actually real, and always has been, we were always ruled by machiavellian deadly decadent court intrigue and betrayal, it was just hidden under and illusion of law and order and peace.
Now a lot of us have woken up to the fact that it was just an illusion, we live under a bunch of conspiracies and counter-conspiracies. A lot of the "crazies" in the "fringe conspiracy subculture" were correct. Take that, Penn and Teller!
"Too many people would have to be involved, no way they could cover something like that up" - people do blow the whistle, and they get ignored, slandered, and "debunked" by useful idiots like you two garbage boomers (one of whom is a Jew and the other is a pervert who swings between "horny fat fuck" and "depressed deflated balloon", and constantly refers to the "nahtzees" as if they were the worst people on the planet, instead of the ones who took a stand against the actual worst people in the world).
If Penn or Teller ever see this, and I know they won't, I have a message for you:
Look at your butt-buddy Michaels Shermer's interview with holocaust deniers, he's clearly losing the debate and having a hard time of it on that show, the holocaust deniers won strong on that programme, and he immediately betrayed everything a skeptic is supposed to be like in the effort to shut them down.
I remember watching that talk show episode and coming away with it believing the opposite of what I had when I first sat down to watch it.
This was further reinforced when I saw the documentary of the Ernst Zundel case that happened in my city. I went from merely believing the holocaust might have been a lie, to knowing for a certain that it was definitely made up.
This was an airtight case that was made, with all the evidence and arguments on one side of the debate, and yet the opposite is accepted as uncontestable fact, simply because of the forces of social pressure and government power. No one wants to accept that this genocide didn't actually occur, so it becomes something that is determined to be untrue on an "A Priori" basis.
Even the court case that concluded that it didn't happen had a verdict that said it did happen, why? because even after all the evidence and arguments were examined, and the result was the exact opposite of what everyone expected, they determined that because Jews were so deeply affected by the events that didn't occur, we should conclude that they did, basically "Ruling in favor of X makes Jews upset, therefore X must be rejected".
The documentary runs itself in circles trying to make this seem like a just and fair verdict that isn't a completely fucked up act of tyranny from the bench, they did it by focusing on the sad Jews who were involved in the case, talking about how "justice was done" and "truth prevailed" and how that "nightmare was over" for them (you know, because they worked themselves up that they were so fucking terrified of the "ebul nahtzees", which was also a focus of the documentary). Then it was simply declared that any attempts at getting the case retried were to be denied automatically, and any future case where the holocaust would be called into doubt would be forbidden.
The whole case was then treated as "a bigot's attempt at the humiliation of the Jewish people, beaten by the power of the truth", like it was a victory, like the whole verdict wasn't a sham, the Judge who ruled it apparently disagreed, he dies regretting this and wishing he could have changed it.
So we walk into a courtroom, where there are severe penalties for lying or deception (including through fallacious argumentation), and all evidence and arguments are thoroughly examined and analyzed (by both sides), and every expert in the WORLD was willing to come and participate, and the conspiracy theorists tear the whole prevailing narrative to fucking shreds, they just clean house, the whole of everything back them up to such a degree that it embarrasses anyone who saw it and believed in the holocaust claims. They get a curb-stomp, one-sided trial in their favor.
...and they lose, because they hold no power, and the judge can declare whatever the fuck he wants, and everyone hated them, if anyone cared for the truth as revealed by science, they would have won, but since no one cared about the truth, and were only holding the trial because they thought their side was going to win, the "conspiracy theorists" lost, it all came down to "might makes right" and "right" includes the right to decide the truth is whatever they want it to be.
For a more modern example, look at the 2020 election fraud, the claim was determined to be untrue because the courts refused to hear it at all, smart, they may have learned from incidents like the Zundel case that when you are afraid of seeing your claims torn to shreds, you do whatever it takes to keep them from ever being officially questioned at all (on the chance that your claims are full of shit).
Tell me how that makes any sense as a means of "debunking" a claim - "I'm not listening to you, therefore everything you say is untrue" - that is the logic of kindergarteners being used here, and it is seemingly enough on it's own to "debunk" a conspiracy theory.
This is the problem that faces conspiracy theories, they may be true and able to prove themselves beyond a shadow of a doubt, but no one is willing to listen, and those who do? they will use any excuse not to pretend the theorists are wrong, even age regressing playground logic like "you make people sad" or "I've got my ears plugged up", those with the power will simply use it in whatever way they think will make it so that their beliefs are not challenged. then later they will see the damage caused by this childishness, and wish they could reverse it, but they will die without having that opportunity.
(post is archived)