Calling it an "insurrection" is not only inaccurate but feeds into the MSM narrative.
Calling it an "insurrection" is not only inaccurate but feeds into the MSM narrative.
https:// newrepublic .com /article /160975/ trump-era-always-going-end-violence
Trump era always going (to) end (in) violence
(((newrepublic)))
e;
Any schoolchild can recite the story’s opening chapter: The Southern states refused to sign on to a new constitution absent veto power over the rest of the states that did not organize their economies around the institution of chattel slavery. The veto took the form of the Senate, the Electoral College, and the “three-fifths compromise,” inscribing reaction into the nation’s charter at the level of the human soul. With that victory, something was institutionalized within the psyche of the South itself: the region’s entitlement to an equal say, or even a dominant one, in the governing of the nation, no matter its share of the population.
Goes on to lie about history to make it look worse than reality?
Dear @(((OP))) why the fuck do you read this (((site)))?
https:// newrepublic .com /article /160975/ trump-era-always-going-end-violence
>Trump era always going (to) end (in) violence
https://archive.md/KNaNa
(((newrepublic)))
e;
>Any schoolchild can recite the story’s opening chapter: The Southern states refused to sign on to a new constitution absent veto power over the rest of the states that did not organize their economies around the institution of chattel slavery. The veto took the form of the Senate, the Electoral College, and the “three-fifths compromise,” inscribing reaction into the nation’s charter at the level of the human soul. With that victory, something was institutionalized within the psyche of the South itself: the region’s entitlement to an equal say, or even a dominant one, in the governing of the nation, no matter its share of the population.
Goes on to lie about history to make it look worse than reality?
Dear @(((OP))) why the fuck do you read this (((site)))?
(post is archived)