It isn't about how informed I am, it's about what you choose to believe. I "believe" nothing. DATA shows there is no evidence of any fraud. If you have the DATA then you should be calling a lawyer. Drumpf's own judges tossed cases based on shit proof.
You're not helping your cause.
For those looking at this ghetto shitbirds posts, heres how he will respond when I offer proof:
"that not real evidence"
"that was debunked" (but he wont offer any actual evidence to prove his claim)
"that just ONE example" (and this argument will be used for every subsequent example, because the intent is never to ask for evidence, the intent is to dismiss out of hand)
Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ0xDWhWUxk
it's about what you choose to believe. I "believe" nothing.
You believe nothing because you're a liar.
Wheres your fucking evidence?
Oh right, the state shredded it and prevented the right from inspecting the ballots or machines.
Not trying to prove anything, you are. If you're so sure, lawyer up or shut up.
Not trying to prove anything, you are. If you're so sure, lawyer up or shut up.
Moving the goalposts.
State your opinion on it: there was fraud or not.
You don't get to claim one thing and claim "but its not a belief, its based on data" when you haven't offered a single piece of evidence and I have.
(post is archived)