WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 6 pts

Do you poast anything that isn't written by kikenvermin?

Looks like the JIDF feeds you links.

[–] 3 pts

I'm not cool with that at all. I just question why the solution involves giving a fourth corporation (that those three control) the power to redistribute the internet.

The real answer is to fucking leave twitter. Actually get up off his ass, make an account somewhere else and post there. Every twitter user is a part of the solution to this problem. We do not need kiked courts, swamped regulators or crooked politicians.

[–] 3 pts

Things are a lot worse than you think. Sure, you can make a competitor. But they media will attack you, dox you, slander you. The hosting companies are almost all owned by left wing people, who will just delete your site and cut your hosting if they don't like you.

[–] 3 pts

Yes, and we have to find ways around that too. My point is that the guys who say "they have a monopoly, so it's find to use the government to fix the problem" have forgotten that the government are the problem. If the government were trustworthy this situation wouldn't exist.

[–] 0 pt

entry costs inhibit competition

[–] 1 pt

If that were true then facebook would not exist. There's plenty of competitors, the only thing holding facebook and twatter up is conservatives being too lazy to leave.

All the social media giants are hanging by a thread. They're barely profitable or even lossmaking, and their userbase is no longer growing. They have to monetise now with the users they have or they never will. Even a 10% loss of users to another platform would be a nail in their coffin.

[–] 3 pts

These companies don't need profits, they can fall back on their stock price market cap to fund them. That money recently has come from the federal reserve with their buybacks and repurchases.

[–] 1 pt

If that were true then facebook would not exist.

You mean that site whose creation was subsidized (intentionally or not) by Harvard, one of the richest academic institutions in the world?

[–] 1 pt

Make it so

[–] 1 pt

I mean... they can only do that if their services are the only ones you use.

[–] 1 pt

And they can't. People are just lazy and don't want to bother using alternative platforms.

Incoming witch hunt would force them to move their asses.

[+] [deleted] 3 pts
[–] 0 pt

They aren't dudes. They are sick fucks.

I'm worried about crazies going after all of them. I truly think we are at that point.

[–] 0 pt

Those rich dudes answer to owners of vanguard group.

[–] 0 pt

Noam Blum. Oh look, a jew playing the second side.

[–] 0 pt

The Jew is right.

[–] 0 pt

that is obviously not relevant there are many sites on the internet not controlled by "the rich men"