This is going to be just like the Holohoax narrative "evidence doesn't matter, the consensus is the evidence".
This is going to be just like the Holohoax narrative "evidence doesn't matter, the consensus is the evidence".
Hard to defend. It is easy to proof that voting machines are insecure, have back doors, and algorithms to switch votes. These features are needed for the international market and are not disabled for the local market. But the allegation that it was Dominion itself who activated and used these features is impossible to proof.
Hard to defend. It is easy to proof that voting machines are insecure, have back doors, and algorithms to switch votes. These features are needed for the international market and are not disabled for the local market. But the allegation that it was Dominion itself who activated and used these features is impossible to proof.
Civil court has a much lower requirement for evidence.
Civil court has a much lower requirement for evidence.
(post is archived)