WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

273

Before everyone starts foaming at the mouth, check out these two definitions for 'Dictator'.

  1. a person who tells people what to do in an autocratic way or who determines behavior in a particular sphere.

  2. a chief magistrate with absolute power, appointed in an emergency

Considering we're about to have creepy uncle Joe in a power position, our country is facing an emergency situation. We NEED a person in a position of power who demands that certain behaviors are NOT acceptable in a country of morals and high standards.

We NEED a dictator to announce that these types of behaviors will NOT be tolerated and have the balls to drop the hammer even on those who believe they are untouchable:

1) the sexual abuse of children

2) creating content that displays children in a sexual manner (looking at you, Netflix)

3) Forcing people to get vaccinated

4) Participating in public demonstrations of debauchery and indecency (ex. gay pride parades)

5) Being part of a secret society (ex. George W. Bush: "So secret I can't even talk about it.")

6) Being against gun ownership for self protection, yet enjoying the security of being protected by men and women with guns

7) Forcing people to stay in their homes and wear masks when they are healthy and have a strong immune system

8) Promoting the murder of unborn children instead of the various birth control methods and adoption

9) Banning symbols that represent activities that harm children (see FBI pedo symbols such as the triangle that folds in on itself)

10) --- Your suggestions are welcome ---

Maybe we've been lied to the whole time about how horrible a dictator would be because those who should be cornered are scared of what it would mean for them if a dictator of Godly standards was put in charge. After all, don't the Ten Commandments dictate how a decent person is supposed to go about their everyday lives?

Before everyone starts foaming at the mouth, check out these two definitions for 'Dictator'. 2. a person who tells people what to do in an autocratic way or who determines behavior in a particular sphere. 3. a chief magistrate with absolute power, appointed in an emergency Considering we're about to have creepy uncle Joe in a power position, our country is facing an emergency situation. We NEED a person in a position of power who demands that certain behaviors are NOT acceptable in a country of morals and high standards. We NEED a dictator to announce that these types of behaviors will NOT be tolerated and have the balls to drop the hammer even on those who believe they are untouchable: 1) the sexual abuse of children 2) creating content that displays children in a sexual manner (looking at you, Netflix) 3) Forcing people to get vaccinated 4) Participating in public demonstrations of debauchery and indecency (ex. gay pride parades) 5) Being part of a secret society (ex. George W. Bush: "So secret I can't even talk about it.") 6) Being against gun ownership for self protection, yet enjoying the security of being protected by men and women with guns 7) Forcing people to stay in their homes and wear masks when they are healthy and have a strong immune system 8) Promoting the murder of unborn children instead of the various birth control methods and adoption 9) Banning symbols that represent activities that harm children (see FBI pedo symbols such as the triangle that folds in on itself) 10) --- Your suggestions are welcome --- Maybe we've been lied to the whole time about how horrible a dictator would be because those who should be cornered are scared of what it would mean for them if a dictator of Godly standards was put in charge. After all, don't the Ten Commandments dictate how a decent person is supposed to go about their everyday lives?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I think you're going to get one regardless. The powers manipulating our politics have had us on a slow crawl, which has been accelerated very quickly in recent years, toward the destruction of republicanism. They're not giving you an out. A republic is a very, very delicate thing, and when they fail, dictatorship is the outcome, coerced or otherwise. Now, I'm using the term 'dictatorship' quite loosely here, where I generally mean coerced rule. You're going to get either some plutocratic pseudo-statist oligarchy - the richest globalists are going to install a cabal to control you. Or, on the other side of the spectrum, your Q plan succeeds, and realizes in the face of its challenges and near-failure that monarchic rule is all that is feasible, giving you a traditionalist kind of church-military complex.

Anywhere but the beautiful, and delicate path of the republican middle. It's the most delicate balance to be there, and requires the highest duties and responsibilities of the people to maintain. Divide the people, extricate them from their role in governance. Create in-fighting. You'll drift from the republican center toward totalitarianism, whichever side.

The trick happening today is to convince people that 'whichever side' of totalitarianism we get will be fundamentally different from the other. They won't. It's Jews on either side waiting to catch the pitch. The fact that you think it would be different is the magic, and their letting the chaos they create in your ranks dictate which side we drift toward is the real way they maintain control. It's just too big to be orchestrated this way! Wrong. The Jew is a gambler that lets the deck get shuffled, but stacks the house to make sure no matter what, the hand they wind up with is the winning one.