He is indeed what you say. In this instance, however, he is not wrong.
He is indeed what you say. In this instance, however, he is not wrong.
Ah, but that is exactly the problem. He's trying to get you to focus on something, and you are.
It's all calculated. When Cucker is talking about something, it's because those pulling his strings want you focused on that news story. And let me tell you, the impetus is never to benefit you.
Ah, but that is exactly the problem. He's trying to get you to focus on something, and you are.
It's all calculated. When Cucker is talking about something, it's because those pulling his strings want you focused on that news story. And let me tell you, the impetus is *never* to benefit you.
I completely agree with you. Every news talking head is paid to direct our attention where their bosses want it directed. Being aware of that (somewhat) mitigates the effect.
I completely agree with you. *Every* news talking head is paid to direct our attention where their bosses want it directed. Being aware of that (somewhat) mitigates the effect.
Being aware of that (somewhat) mitigates the effect.
Indeed. One must pay very close attention to how they are reacting to the new article.
IMO, the operative strategy is to avoid reading MSM entirely.
> Being aware of that (somewhat) mitigates the effect.
Indeed. One must pay *very* close attention to how they are reacting to the new article.
IMO, the operative strategy is to avoid reading MSM entirely.
(post is archived)