@Simo_Hayha, [something vaguely disparaging, but is actually a thinly-veiled attempt at friendship].
@Simo_Hayha, [something vaguely disparaging, but is actually a thinly-veiled attempt at friendship].
Crude Summary: Milo Yiannopolous is blackmailing various right-wing figures such as Richard Spencer and he's working with the FBI. Nick Fuentes' relationship with Yiannopoloius is brought into question due to this. As a side note, the writer, James Allsup, implies Fuentes is dating a catboy. That is untrue. Allsup is upset because Fuentes can be rather petty, though the core of Fuentes' complaint, that fascists tend to be wignats or feds, is valid.
Allsup's evaluation of Yiannopolous' goals: "At this point, Milo’s intent is clear: hijack nationalist sentiments away to steer them away from racial & class consciousness, directing them instead towards a pro-Israel, pro-Catholic, anti-Islam, anti-family 'groyper nationalism.' "
I'd like to explain the potential issue of the pro-Catholic direction. While Catholics are known to breed like rabbits (except in Italy and even some Latin American nations which struggle with fertility), greater Catholicism may not revitalize America. America is a majority Protestant country and the Protestant values have been extremely helpful for America's growth. I don't mean to be anti-Catholic by saying this: I know many wonderful Catholics and I know there are arguments that Protestantism has philosophically lead us to where we are today. However, one cannot deny how America and Northern Europe have advanced scientifically and economically (also, I have some bias in favor of Protestantism due to my upbringing). My point is that Catholicism could be considered anti-American due to it not being the dominant sect of Christianity in this country.
Allsup then moves onto the relationship between Yiannopolous and Patrick Casey, leader of American Identity Movement (note: Allsup has made a warning (cdn.discordapp.com) about AIM.) This is despite, and hopefully not because, Yiannopolous doxxing current and former AIM members.
Allsup's conclusion is somewhat irksome. On the whole, the article is valuable, but I think his distaste for American nationalism is incorrect. He desires a class-conscious white movement. Of course, that's a not a big deal.
Crude Summary: Milo Yiannopolous is blackmailing various right-wing figures such as Richard Spencer and he's working with the FBI. Nick Fuentes' relationship with Yiannopoloius is brought into question due to this. As a side note, the writer, James Allsup, implies Fuentes is dating a catboy. That is untrue. Allsup is upset because Fuentes can be rather petty, though the core of Fuentes' complaint, that fascists tend to be wignats or feds, is valid.
Allsup's evaluation of Yiannopolous' goals: "At this point, Milo’s intent is clear: hijack nationalist sentiments away to steer them away from racial & class consciousness, directing them instead towards a pro-Israel, pro-Catholic, anti-Islam, anti-family 'groyper nationalism.' "
I'd like to explain the potential issue of the pro-Catholic direction. While Catholics are known to breed like rabbits (except in Italy and even some Latin American nations which struggle with fertility), greater Catholicism may not revitalize America. America is a majority Protestant country and the Protestant values have been extremely helpful for America's growth. I don't mean to be anti-Catholic by saying this: I know many wonderful Catholics and I know there are arguments that Protestantism has philosophically lead us to where we are today. However, one cannot deny how America and Northern Europe have advanced scientifically and economically (also, I have some bias in favor of Protestantism due to my upbringing). My point is that Catholicism could be considered anti-American due to it not being the dominant sect of Christianity in this country.
Allsup then moves onto the relationship between Yiannopolous and Patrick Casey, leader of American Identity Movement (note: Allsup has made a [warning](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/593151474230493193/730424348044820570/unknown.png) about AIM.) This is despite, and hopefully not because, Yiannopolous doxxing current and former AIM members.
Allsup's conclusion is somewhat irksome. On the whole, the article is valuable, but I think his distaste for American nationalism is incorrect. He desires a class-conscious white movement. Of course, that's a not a big deal.
(post is archived)