"It felt like when the hell are they going to f—ing call on me?" he said after a November debate on MSNBC. "The hypocrisy of MSNBC in a way just makes us stronger. I'm almost—almost grateful."
You know the media bias is bad when even the democrats need to call it out. He isn't wrong either. The media is a wing of the democrat party. Yang wasn't on their list of prefered candidates. No surprise he did not get coverage.
Will this lead to a new found accountability from the MSM, NOPE!
Yang and Gabbard have valid complaints about the coverage they receive.
Yang certainly wouldn't have been my choice, but as far as the democrats go he wasn't completely awful.
- Leave min. wage to the states
- Support of charter schools
- No free college
- Supports the Electoral College
- Endorses eating less meat to combat climate change (hey why not, it's low impact and voluntary)
- Opposes Medicare for all (does want to expand coverage :(
- Backs wall funding (if experts recommend it, whatever that means)
Sure he is crazy on a lot of issues, but he is more viable than a Biden or Sanders.
Yep. Neither he nor Tulsi are perfect but both are better than the crop of lunatics in the lead.
(post is archived)