Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 1 decided that a union’s deliberate destruction of company property as a pressure tactic in a labor dispute is not protected by federal law.

Source Article (zerohedge.com)

>In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 1 decided that a union’s deliberate destruction of company property as a pressure tactic in a labor dispute is not protected by federal law. [Source Article](https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-deals-blow-unions-rules-company-can-sue-damage-caused-strike)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

wait that title is misleading to the actual ruling... I thought it meant "damage" as in lost revenue due to the strike. Not actual damage done to things. This makes sense.

[–] • 1 pt

Too late to change the title now. I should have added "physical". The post text body has it.

[–] • 1 pt

No I get it, I edited to explain myself.