A simple demonstration by Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) stirring up the water brings a sheen of chemicals to the surface.
That's not a conclusive test of the water being polluted by the chemicals from the train. There has not been enough time to have the vinyl chloride or any of the other chemicals from the train cars settle to the creek bed. Also, if the chemicals are low density enough and insoluble in water, then they'd already be on the surface of the water causing a sheen and not sink into the sediment.
Sheens on water occur when the material does not mix with water and forms a film that is extremely thin, one or a few molecules thick, film that diffracts light at different wavelengths similar to the colorful skin of a soap bubble. It needs to be established that vinyl chloride is capable of making such a thin film and sheen. It also needs to be much more analytical a test in which the water samples are analyzed for content rather than simple observation. This is why this simple demonstration is bogus. That sheen is likely from substances that have been in the water a long time and could even be organic/natural in origin.
Unless you put the samples through a mass spectrometer or magnetic resonance analysis, it cannot be said in truth that this is the result of the deliberate spill. This is just more fearmongering to divide us. While I do believe there is great danger in some areas, don't go full cheesenigger and believe everything just because it comes from a source you like. (((Lying))) happens on all sides for the same (((reasons))). Seek real truth from honest data and analysis.
I agree, and how much of that crap was already there (being Ohio) or just a natural byproduct of last fall's rotting leaves lining the banks. But the optics are strong for those who take it at face value.
But the optics are strong for those who take it at face value.
And therein lies the problem. This is what allowed the jews to bring us to the (((post-truth))) world we live in now. It is demonstrations like this that shut off people's brains for critical thinking and simply switch them into programming mode. The term (((optics))) is used to amplify that programming's ability to take hold. If it's popular and has strong (((optics))), then it is a replacement for truth and a good vector for (((programming))). It's all just jew tricks and lies at this point.
In most cases, yes. Or in this case, it could be a politician looking to show concern for his constituents with a poorly thought out tweet that probably hits the mark anyway. Those people are desperate and grateful for any national attention to help get this resolved more quickly than it is. He's a senator, let's see what he actually does/is able to do about it.
Article says they are testing for the chemicals released, problem is th vast majority burned, badly. They need to do full mass spectrometry analysis a d find the outputs of overly rich combustion of mixed toxic death. No. They won’t likely find vinlyl chloride In it’s original form, that’s dishonest.
Article says they are testing for the chemicals released, problem is th vast majority burned, badly. They need to do full mass spectrometry analysis a d find the outputs of overly rich combustion of mixed toxic death. No. They won’t likely find vinlyl chloride In it’s original form, that’s dishonest.
But we do know what the combustion decomposition products are for vinyl chloride so they can analyze the samples for those. I don't expect any truth to come from any source on such analysis though since the jews control so much. I think the only thing we can do at this point is use this to drive our rage towards solving the real problem once and for all. We can't fix this already happened event, but we can make those responsible for it become nothing more than a footnote in the future history we write. Make them pay in the most meaningful way possible- with their bloodlines.
I agree with you, except the decomposition products of vinyl chloride. I read the testing protocol, it’s proper combustion under ideal conditions. This was a dumpster fire, that smoke is something far worse. You can read the protocols of burning gasoline, it’s pretty damn clean at the end. Then you dump it in a ditch in the winter with other chemicals and let it undertake unknown reactions and then burn oxygen deprived and you have a toxic mess of highly dangerous pm 2.5 particulate matter (that crosses the blood brain barrier) that is carcinegenic atbest and possibly far worse.
(post is archived)