That letter lists staff complaints that essentially boil down to O'Keefe being a rather difficult boss, something of a "tyrant," and once having eaten a pregnant woman's sandwich.
I saw the "eaten a pregnant woman's sandwich" on some feed and assume it meant something sexual. Are they really trying to oust the executive and founder because he didn't follow etiquette in the lunch room? Sure it's a dick move, but what happened to the old fashioned way of dealing with this using hot pepper extract and copious amounts of laxatives?
Yep, the Chief financial officer should've been on top of any 'alleged' misappropriation of funds as well. It is an obvious stich up job, i barely believe even normies are falling for it. Even if everything detailed actually occurred as stated (i doubt it) it's simply a matter of the Board stepping in to correct / guide the supposed conduct of the face of the brand - but nope straight 'he's gotta go'.
Joos are behind this , i say ....
(post is archived)