Yep, the Chief financial officer should've been on top of any 'alleged' misappropriation of funds as well. It is an obvious stich up job, i barely believe even normies are falling for it. Even if everything detailed actually occurred as stated (i doubt it) it's simply a matter of the Board stepping in to correct / guide the supposed conduct of the face of the brand - but nope straight 'he's gotta go'. Joos are behind this , i say ....