WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

502

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

objectivity is now considered reactionary and even harmful.

Yes, to the kleptocracy.

We have been discussing the rise of advocacy journalism and the rejection of objectivity in journalism schools.

This is very clear.

in favor of open advocacy.

Journalists need to be overt and candid advocates for social justice, and it’s hard to do that under the constraints of objectivity.

Society has officially committed suicide.

I’m a Biased Journalist and I’m Okay With That.

I'm ok with that too. Just don't call it news. It's opinion. But then you can't be as effective with your agenda if you don't lie.

Polls show trust in the media at an all-time low

Huh!

objectivity is virtually synonymous with prejudice.

The article goes on. It's clear this is no different than fluid gender. Truth is now fluid. It is what we purport it to be. Science (truth) is what we say it us. If you question it, you are a heretic.

[–] 1 pt

These people went to journalism school and don’t realize that there’s already an outlet for opinions in journalism?

That’s precisely what editorials and the column sections are for.