Put her in solitary until she starts remembering names. No lights and bread and water only until we know names.
Put her in solitary until she starts remembering names. No lights and bread and water only until we know names.
Idk if there is more to the interview, but this is bollocks. No questions about who were the 'clients'?
Idk if there is more to the interview, but this is bollocks. No questions about who were the 'clients'?
No questions about who were the 'clients'?
Exactly. That's the only time she should even be allowed to hear a voice. When she's being asked if she's ready to give names.
> No questions about who were the 'clients'?
Exactly. That's the only time she should even be allowed to hear a voice. When she's being asked if she's ready to give names.
The flight logs and who visited the island have already been released and not a damn thing has been done to those clients do you think more names being dropped would matter?
The flight logs and who visited the island have already been released and not a damn thing has been done to those clients do you think more names being dropped would matter?
Names in a flight log is not proof of anything regardless of how bad you want it to be.
Names in a flight log is not proof of anything regardless of how bad you want it to be.
I agree circumstantial evidence only.
I agree circumstantial evidence only.
(post is archived)