WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pregnant-texas-woman-says-unborn-baby-count-car-passenger-receiving-ho-rcna37531 -> https://archive.ph/IO49U

I agree with this fully. Just like when a nigger kills a pregnant White girl he's charged with double murder.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pregnant-texas-woman-says-unborn-baby-count-car-passenger-receiving-ho-rcna37531 -> https://archive.ph/IO49U I agree with this fully. Just like when a nigger kills a pregnant White girl he's charged with double murder.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The purpose of HOV lanes is to reduce traffic congestion. Her pregnancy doesn't change this. Also, police don't have time to pull over every fat chick and perform cervical exams to determine who's pregnant with child vs cheeseburgers.

A gestating child is occupying the women, not the vehicle. Until that child can be independently strapped into the vehicle, it doesn't count for HOV occupancy counts.

She's retarded.

[–] 0 pt

With that logic, every child that can't drive yet doesn't help with that either as they couldn't drive a separate car in the first place.

[–] 0 pt

Read again. That's the exact opposite of what I clearly stated.

[–] 1 pt

The purpose of HOV lanes is to reduce traffick congestion. Her pregnancy doesn't change this.

A child independently strapped in a car doesn't change this either because they can't drive a separate vehicle either.

[–] 0 pt

every fat chick

Different issue.

A gestating child is occupying the women...

Hello (((roe))).

[–] 0 pt

No. Same issue. You can't pretend women won't abuse it. As obviously that's this women's intent and she actually is pregnant.

[–] 0 pt

You can't pretend women won't abuse it. As obviously that's this women's intent..

She's actually pregnant though. I understand the notion of some ham ABUSING the allowance while they aren't pregnant. But again, that's a food and health issue not a pregnancy or congestion issue. And congestion isn't it's own issue itself. It comes down to a population density issue which... It's complicated AF.

If you agree with someone who kills a pregnant woman being charged with double murder - which should be the case - then you agree here too. Yes this can be abused by hams, no she's not "abusing" it; she's making a point and she probably doesn't understand the different but more relevant point. This is a societal question. Any society that doesn't support pregnant mothers as a higher tier of citizen than others is a trash society and all of poal's loved and cherished men of past would and have agreed.