First of all, I wasn't even genuinely arguing. I guess you could say I was playing Devil's advocate. Second, you're not understanding what I'm saying because you are incapable of dissecting your own argument. A different body can in fact travel in a different vehicle. A child can not legally operate a vehicle. So in this scenario (stay with me now) the child in a mother's womb is no different than a child buckled up in the back seat. Both of these hypothetical children (whether it be a fetus, or a child that has already been born) can't operate a vehicle That child is going to take up the same amount of room no matter how you frame it. Neither of these children are adding cars to the roadway. Can you squint and comprehend that part of the argument or are you too stupid to think outside of the box? Edit: It's always the most ignorant clowns that are the most confident. You all see any argument as an attack and immediately get defensive. I wasn't attacking you, clown. I was dissecting your argument. That's all.