![[src + arch inside] Pregnant Texas woman says unborn baby should count as car passenger after receiving HOV ticket -> If you disagree with he you're retarded. [1170x1464 - 313KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/AfS0Ur.jpg){kind=link}
You can't pretend women won't abuse it. As obviously that's this women's intent..
She's actually pregnant though. I understand the notion of some ham ABUSING the allowance while they aren't pregnant. But again, that's a food and health issue not a pregnancy or congestion issue. And congestion isn't it's own issue itself. It comes down to a population density issue which... It's complicated AF.
If you agree with someone who kills a pregnant woman being charged with double murder - which should be the case - then you agree here too. Yes this can be abused by hams, no she's not "abusing" it; she's making a point and she probably doesn't understand the different but more relevant point. This is a societal question. Any society that doesn't support pregnant mothers as a higher tier of citizen than others is a trash society and all of poal's loved and cherished men of past would and have agreed.
No I don't agree. And any attempt to purposefully misconstrue my position will be regarded as shill-speak. As this appears to be your leaning in how you position your argument. Stop it.
Read my other comments here. My position is open and shut. There isn't room to misunderstand my position and honestly, it's the only reasonable position offered which addresses the actual intent and merit.
You're trying to make this about abortion. It has nothing to do with abortion and is dishonest to attempt to force it into context. This is strictly about vehicle occupancy and the theoretical or actual removal of a vehicle from the road to reduce congestion. It's not about abortion or when life begins - or acknowledgment of either. If you choose to squint to see it another way, that's only your failing, not mine. There is literally no way a developing fetus can sanely travel in another vehicle, distinct from that of its mother. Therefore her pregnancy has zero bearing on occupancy and traffic. Period. End of discussion.
As I said, this is a simple issue and she's retarded.
You're trying to...
No I'm not. Read here;
And any attempt to purposefully misconstrue my position will be regarded as shill-speak. As this appears to be your leaning in how you position your argument. Stop it.
If you choose to squint to see it another way, that's only your failing, not mine.
mirror.png
Every point in your post is dishonest, I'm not giving you or your reply credence. Fuck off.
Given your historical bullshit, way laying, and dishonest history with me, my position remains reasonable. You're refusal to acknowledge doesn't change the facts here or your past with me. Perhaps paranoia on my part but well deserved on your part.
Finally, the facts still remain, regardless of your acknowledgment, I'm right and she's retarded.
(post is archived)