I don't see how executive orders can contradict a Constitutional Amendment. Unless they've changed the meaning of "shall not be infringed."
I don't see how executive orders can contradict a Constitutional Amendment. Unless they've changed the meaning of "shall not be infringed."
i agree, but it's like suing ppl. you can sue a ham sandwich, but that doesn't mean its reasonable or correct. they will push through whatever bullshit they want, but the problem is when there's no pushback and morons who've come to accept big daddy government actually defend their actions then we're fucked. it then sets the precedent that the government can railroad your rights even though our founding document literally states they are the ones being contained and can't infringe on GOD GIVEN rights.
i agree, but it's like suing ppl. you can sue a ham sandwich, but that doesn't mean its reasonable or correct. they will push through whatever bullshit they want, but the problem is when there's no pushback and morons who've come to accept big daddy government actually defend their actions then we're fucked. it then sets the precedent that the government can railroad your rights even though our founding document literally states they are the ones being contained and can't infringe on GOD GIVEN rights.
The Constitution hasn't meant shit in over 100 years.
The Constitution hasn't meant shit in over 100 years.
(post is archived)