Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

138

(post is archived)

[–] • 10 pts (edited )

There can be no executive action taken on Constitutional rights unless our Nation is mesmerized or asleep. Do not forget, our Bill of Rights does not give us permission to exercise said rights, it prevents our government from restricting us to exercise said rights. Do not let them convince you otherwise.

[–] • 0 pt

The Presidency was stolen by a diaper-shitting mummy and a professional dicksucker. What makes you think it can't get worse?

[–] • 3 pts

I don't see how executive orders can contradict a Constitutional Amendment. Unless they've changed the meaning of "shall not be infringed."

[–] • 0 pt

i agree, but it's like suing ppl. you can sue a ham sandwich, but that doesn't mean its reasonable or correct. they will push through whatever bullshit they want, but the problem is when there's no pushback and morons who've come to accept big daddy government actually defend their actions then we're fucked. it then sets the precedent that the government can railroad your rights even though our founding document literally states they are the ones being contained and can't infringe on GOD GIVEN rights.

[–] • 0 pt

The Constitution hasn't meant shit in over 100 years.

[–] • 1 pt

From the thumbnail I thought Richard Simmons was speaking at the White House.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I smell lots of lawsuits around the corner of this "executive action".

[–] • 1 pt

Or bullets

[–] • 0 pt

LOL, sure buddy, any day now