Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Casey Scott, said curious students engaged her in a discussion about her pansexuality, which led to students requesting to draw flags representative of their own sexuality.

I guarantee that's not how things went. Unless there was a donkey or an entire sports team involved, I am sure a bunch of middle schoolers had no interest in knowing who this pervert sleeps with. Also, drawing multicolored flags should be way beneath the skill level of an average middle school student.

[–] • 2 pts

I'm a little confused. The bill bans these "discussions" for 3rd grade and younger.

This teacher is a middle school teacher. 6th grade to 8th grade. How does the law apply here?

Don't get me wrong. Fuck this groomer. She should have been fired regardless.....and more. Her name deserves to be on a list. But the law doesn't seem to apply here. Law of common sense still applies though.

[–] • 1 pt

The article states that all this actually happened last month, pre anti-groomer bill. They are just running the story now for the rage clicks.

[–] • 1 pt

The law says "age appropriate"

It applies to all grades.

[–] • 1 pt

The bill only covers up to 3rd grade. Is 3rd grade considered middle school in Florida?

[–] • 1 pt

My teacher talked explicitly about sex in class. Sex Ed class in 6th grade.

[–] • 1 pt

with respect to biology, not mental illness

[–] • 0 pt

with respect to biology, not mental illness

Yep. Human reproduction in all it's awkward glory.

[–] • 1 pt

Sexual conversation is between a parent and their children. In extreme cases a certified STRAIGHT Healthcare professional. Grooming is disgusting and shaping a child's sexuality based on your own out of being insane should be a criminal offense.

When I grew up our teachers didn't say shit about their personal life and if they tried pushing sexual shit on kids they were fired.

[–] • 1 pt

Awesome.

Hang her.