Speed cameras won't work in the US system of justice.
- You need a witness, under oath, at trial, to introduce video evidence. 2. The defendant has a right to confront an accuser.
Fighting a video traffic ticket is almost exclusively a win.
watch new laws come in to support them.
then watch rich people lawyer their way out of fines.
You can't pass laws that subjugate the right to due process. Every state in the nation as well as federally, and backed by countless SCOTUS decisions, require the state to provide an accuser to be confronted at trial and the rules of evidence that require any evidence offered into record to be offered into evidence by an involved party while under oath at trial.
That's why if the cop doesn't show up to court, you win. If the cop doesn't show up, he can't testify, and the ticket that he wrote can't be used as evidence against you.
Plenty of jurisdictions allow them.
Yes. They allow them. Because it is profitable to allow them. The jurisdictions that don't allow them stopped allowing them when it became unprofitable to allow them.
People have to fight the ticket, which means up to 3 or even 4 days of lost wages to fight a ticket that costs max $200. Most people won't bother. However, after you beat the ticket, the municipality that issued the ticket is now subject to a lawsuit. If just a very few people follow through on the lawsuit, the cameras get used for monitoring, not revenue generation.
(post is archived)