Watching it now, but had an idea. He mentions large tech companies deciding what you can "see or not see"
Since Nazi was originally meant as a derogatory term for NSDAP, I think it makes sense to make "NotSees" a derogatory term for mainstream tech and media. Pushed as it's literal sense, not as a comparison to Nazis. That should be the standard response - we're not calling them Nazis, they literally decide what people can "Not See"
But the word sticks, it corrupts and normalizes the original meaning, and it's confusing to anyone trying to defend "NotSees"
Is this making sense?
Watching it now, but had an idea. He mentions large tech companies deciding what you can "see or not see"
Since Nazi was originally meant as a derogatory term for NSDAP, I think it makes sense to make "NotSees" a derogatory term for mainstream tech and media. Pushed as it's literal sense, not as a comparison to Nazis. That should be the standard response - we're not calling them Nazis, they literally decide what people can "Not See"
But the word sticks, it corrupts and normalizes the original meaning, and it's confusing to anyone trying to defend "NotSees"
Is this making sense?
(post is archived)