So much passive voice in the article. '...was retained,' '...was reviewed, '...was conveyed,' etc. The writer--who probably wasn't the person credited--wanted to give the impression he was providing more info than was actually provided.
So much passive voice in the article. '...was retained,' '...was reviewed, '...was conveyed,' etc. The writer--who probably wasn't the person credited--wanted to give the impression he was providing more info than was actually provided.
(post is archived)