The law doesn't contradict "gun safety".
It absolutely and unequivocally does. The first law of gun safety is to treat every gun as if it's loaded. This alleged law says to disregard that.
That's not a law. That's NRA advice. And, you are under no obligation to follow it. Yes. You are responsible for shooting people if you disregard it, but there are no obligations to be "safe" with a gun, outside of reckless endangerment type shit.
That's not a law.
I know some people have a difficult time with words that have multiple definitions, but seriously. That's like the drooling leftist bedwetters that can't understand calling something "gay" because it's stupid has nothing to do with homosexuals.
The suggestion that the assault laws run afoul with gun safety standards or that the DA broke the law by pointing that rifle at the jury is stupid.
(post is archived)