WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

401

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Also violated his civil rights, lied and pointed a weapon at the jury.

[–] 1 pt

Isn't pointing a weapon assault?

[–] 1 pt

INAL, but I believe it's aggravated assault.

[–] 0 pt

No. No reasonable person could believe the rifle was possibly loaded.

[–] 1 pt

Accidental shootings happen all the time. All reasonable people believe a weapon is always loaded.

[–] 0 pt

Imagine it was and he Alec'd a member of the jury... anything is possible in this pointless and dystopian clownworld.

[–] 0 pt

Is that the standard under Wisconsin law?

[–] 2 pts

The prosecution WANTS a mistrial. We want a not guilty or a directed verdict of not guilty if that fails.

[–] 3 pts

The motion is for a mistrial with prejudice.

If successful, no retrial. Prosecution's desire to "get another kick at the cat" was addressed in the motion.

[–] 0 pt

What a dumbass this prosecutor is... he probably put thousands of kids aspiring to be lawyers in the wrong direction.