this is a good call from the judge.
convicted jewish sexual predators
I agree, but
Can they bring up their past convictions if they dont apply to intent of the event in question?
With this language set, cant the prosecution call Rittenhouse a rioter/ looter, because he was there too?
this is a good call from the judge.
>convicted jewish sexual predators
I agree, but
Can they bring up their past convictions if they dont apply to intent of the event in question?
With this language set, cant the prosecution call Rittenhouse a rioter/ looter, because he was there too?
cant the prosecution call Rittenhouse a rioter/ looter, because he was there too?
There are video evidences that prove he wasn't there to riot/loot. Quite the opposite.
So it would be a mistake to call him as such.
> cant the prosecution call Rittenhouse a rioter/ looter, because he was there too?
There are video evidences that prove he wasn't there to riot/loot. Quite the opposite.
So it would be a mistake to call him as such.
So it would be a mistake to call him as such.
I have complete faith in our legal system to do the right thing.
/s
> So it would be a mistake to call him as such.
I have complete faith in our legal system to do the right thing.
/s
St. Rittenhouse did nothing wrong.
St. Rittenhouse did nothing wrong.
Sure, just claim that they might have wanted to rape Kyle cause he's underage.
Sure, just claim that they might have wanted to rape Kyle cause he's underage.
Lol great defense.
Lol great defense.
(post is archived)