Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

671

(post is archived)

[–] • 18 pts

They should be called "convicted jewish sexual predators and terrorists"

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

"convicted jewish sexual predators and terrorists"

If the ADL is anything to go by, these are the citizens of judea that warrant their highest honors and protection.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

this is a good call from the judge.

convicted jewish sexual predators

I agree, but

Can they bring up their past convictions if they dont apply to intent of the event in question?

With this language set, cant the prosecution call Rittenhouse a rioter/ looter, because he was there too?

[–] • 4 pts

cant the prosecution call Rittenhouse a rioter/ looter, because he was there too?

There are video evidences that prove he wasn't there to riot/loot. Quite the opposite.

So it would be a mistake to call him as such.

[–] • 1 pt

St. Rittenhouse did nothing wrong.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

So it would be a mistake to call him as such.

I have complete faith in our legal system to do the right thing.

/s

[–] • 2 pts

Sure, just claim that they might have wanted to rape Kyle cause he's underage.

[–] • 9 pts

That's a good start.

[–] • 0 pt

Like Trump was?

[–] • 2 pts

What’s your point? It’s a trial. Not a presidency hamstrung by Jews at every level.

[–] • 0 pt

You’re right. Lol, evidently I either read something wrong or thought I commented on a different post. I’m with ya, only adding who don’t they hamstring.

[–] • 6 pts

Prosecutors suggested "the judge was creating a double standard by allowing Rosenbaum and Huber to be disparaged when they could not defend themselves."

Lmao!

They disparaged themselves by having criminal records!

[–] • 5 pts

They also disparaged themselves in their final moments by trying to chase down and presumably beat, then kill a 17 year old who put out a fire they were trying to set.

Wasn't arson like one of the most atrocious crimes, historically? Like, up there with rape and murder in terms of how you'd be punished? Arsonists not only cause immense property damage, but potentially kill people or fuck them up from smoke inhalation or w/e. Arsonists historically were dealt with swiftly and brutally.

[–] • 3 pts

based judge.

since when are violent people trying to burn loot and murder victims? they are illegitimate terrorists and open game in self defense.

Saint Kyle for Lord Commander of the Youth Divisions in the upcoming war of left vs right, blue vs red. His firearm training is up on my level and I'm twice his age.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I watched the video several times just to see him calmly defending himself against 3 if not more hostiles. The left would have howled with glee to watch them tear him apart. These marxists are truly evil.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Leftists at this stage are needed to go extinct.

[–] • 3 pts

This isn't like the Arbery or Floyd cases, there is a clear right to self defence at stake here. I hope he doesn't lose on some dumb technicality, because Chauvin's lawyer was useless too. If he loses, Biden will immediately push forward his gun control laws on the back of it

[–] • 3 pts

Nothing of worth was lost that night except Kyle's freedom and some property.

[–] • 2 pts

you know what pisses me off? these nigger faggots capitalize black but not White.

Racist, jew communist cunts.

[–] • 2 pts

Despite not being old enough to openly carry a gun,

Lol cope harder bloggerfag

[–] • 2 pts

hmmm im hoping for an inverse with all the J6 shit coming out if you flip all political cases on their heads it would mean like 90% justice for everyone that is a real tangible victim

[–] • 1 pt

Good ruling, but it won't matter. This case comes down to jury selection. It's an obvious case of self-defense and should never have even made it to trial. The jury will decide whether to play politics and ignore reality or to rule in favor of sanity.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Isnt there a circumstance where the judge can say fuck the jurys decision?

Load more (4 replies)