WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

206

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Does she even realize she is talking about nuclear weapons whose purpose is to attack the United States. They couldn't even go with a wishy-washy "concerning". When the White House Press Secretary is physically unable to criticize China, we are beyond serious trouble.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

China to hypersonic missile: you've missed the target.

Hypersonic missile: I'll circle back to it.

[–] 0 pt

Something something nuclear proliferation

Our missle defense system was not put in place as a challenge to nuclear threats.

Paski is encouraging escalation. Shit for brains clearly.

[–] 0 pt

Psaki would welcome a stiff DICK