WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

898

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Well if the mom dies from carrying the fetus to term, then you can just pretend she was goodified by one of those DACA dreamers or african/muslim/haitian "refugees" because the left never gives a shit about a woman dying at their hands. The day when the left does start caring about women being killed by the liberal pets and makes a law against it, then we can talk seriously about the heartbeat abortion ban law. Until then, boo-fucking-hoo.

[–] 2 pts

I'm not in favor of abortion by any stretch (with exceptions), but forcing people to birth a medical bomb isn't better than forcing parents to care for a half-person that can't grow up to be a productive member of any community. Besides, you guys realize the biggest demographic by far who abort is niggers... right? I don't really like it as a whole either, but I'm kinda confused because you guys generally want less niggers around and am curious about that apparent contradiction.

[–] 0 pt

I was waiting for someone to bring this up. If we didn't have the medical imaging equipment we have today, no one would know if a fetus was viable or not until it was born or spontaneously aborted by the mother's body. Because we can "see" the fetus developing now, this argument became possible when before it was an unknown. In nature without foreknowledge of the state of the fetus, it would need to follow the course and the outcome would be whatever it was going to be. You're only concerned about this because we have the ability to predetermine how the pregnancy will go so you are basing your interests on that instead of what nature has done for eons. Nature works it out just fine.

The nigger abortion thing is also artificially induced. If we left niggers to starve without gibs and such, then they wouldn't be shitting out nigglets left and right. The problem isn't abortion or lack thereof; the real problem is propping up niggers with welfare and handouts. Nature takes care of overpopulation by letting them starve or die from illness due to poor health. We fucked with that mechanism so now you need to abort them to control them. We just need to stop propping them up and let nature take its course. No need to kill them if nature does that for you. Abortion is only necessary when you stray from the natural world and are dealing with problems that you caused yourself. Cure the problem and stop treating the symptoms. It worked for a very long time and we need to let it continue to work.

[–] 1 pt

Nature works it out just fine.

Maybe you're right. I've seen first hand what raising a completely debilitated person does to someone though and I'm unsure that if we have the ability to correct these issues and save people from a living hell that we shouldn't take that course. Frankly, this is the extent that I can find exception with extensive abortion bans though, with the only other one being a rape victim I think. I definitely agree with the welfare problems though. I also don't think "niggers kill each other" is a good enough excuse and I'm sort of surprised you defied me.

[–] 2 pts

wtf they wait for it to come to term then euthanise it anyways and they bitch about the abortion ban? sure if politicians hadnt weaponized abortion this shit could be dealt with calm and rationally but once policticians get the grubby hands on something the phrase "this is why we cant have nice things" comes to mind

[–] 2 pts

The mom owes it to her child to see it through. Let nature take its course.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

This!^ When man forgets God in his actions, he makes himself god. God is the giver and taker of life, let His will be done.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

Not buying this bullshit story. How many of the same fear porn bullshit stories will come out? She "carried it to term"?? The law hasn't been that long. 9 months!

[–] 0 pt

Go ahead and let some light in your bunker and clic: She will be forced to carry it to term under the new Texas law.

She should get sterilized if she's only having retards. Not fair to the kid.

[–] 0 pt

I took a medical ethics course, and a third of the course was spent on this very subject. Harshest thing I ever saw in my entire life.

It's a horror show for certain.

There is no easy answer. Theoretically, the doctors are the best qualified to give the best professional ethical advice on a case by case scenario, as to exactly when abortion is the preferred ethical outcome.

However, now that the doctors themselves have become corrupted by the commercial sale of human body parts for profit, even the doctors can no longer be trusted to be advising in the best interests of the family and the child. It is proven beyond any doubt that doctors do abuse this authority in their own self interest, even so far as to commit crimes against humanity. They cannot be trusted. Companies are built around this ethical corruption now. It has become systemic.

That is the ever cruel reality. Merely but one of many such horrors in this world. The legal line has to be drawn somewhere, and in Texas that line is drawn in favor of the possible survival of the child. Making that choice means you will also bring these defective children to term despite the horror this brings. Horror indeed, for It cannot be unseen.

Of course, many doctors will perform these particular abortions anyways, regardless of what the law says. Many institutions and law enforcers will also choose to look the other way when this happens in these particular circumstances. Everyone just shuts the fuck up and pretends it does not happen. Why? Again, because there are no easy answers for this one.

We are but human, and we do not have all the answers.

Some choices that are impossible to make have to be made anyways.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, we see millions of cases like this every day, faggot